Just (b)logging my thoughts, a luxury after being under the Army Act for 20 years. Views and opinions are personal. No claims to being a literary genius!
Sunday, 12 July 2020
Would you prefer to sleep...and leave a few buddies behind, or do you want to undergo sleepless nights ...but go back together?
Thursday, 9 July 2020
Death of a CO on the Line of Control
The next 3 to 4 days were busy, as I and the officiating CO of the battalion moved from company to company post, executing fire assaults on the enemy, sending the message that if they tried to push terrorists across, they would have to face the fury of our firepower. A number of bunkers were reported to have been destroyed every day, but I have not yet seen a change in posture or long term effect of these 'destroyed' bunkers. One of the command bunkers down in the valley and closer to the enemy was destroyed the day after we engaged the enemy from there (they were a day late in doing that, luckily for us). We also had some hot words a couple of times, when infantry wanted me to engage a particular bunker and I had to tell the CO that artillery, least of all mortars cannot directly be aimed to hit pin point targets like bunkers. That day, we were at a post where there was no artillery line(radios could not be opened), and we were to engage with field guns. I had arranged to use the infantry line on time sharing basis(innovate when required, like a good gunner officer!), but the exchange would keep switching the line for other admin tasks and our shoot was taking a long time. The CO said "we could get this over with as soon as artillery is able to fire" or some such remark, and I gave back "we could start the fire as soon as the infantry stops using the line to coordinate rations". But in the end, we had an eventful day, because the enemy correctly guessed where we were firing from and hit us with everything they had(artillery, rockets machine gun fire).
Sunday, 5 July 2020
Case of the Missing Meat
Saturday, 4 July 2020
Siachen Story Part 4 - The army moves you by air only to induct in a hurry!
I stayed overnight at Thoise airfield, thanks to my course mate from the airforce. It was good to be among friends and recount the ground level stories from Amar post with the flyboys, who would only land there for a couple of minutes. I also opened up the annual confidential report that I had received in mail - the air force officers were very curious about it and wanted to take a look. The armed forces confidential reports are on a scale of 1 to 9, and they were impressed with the number of 9s and 8s in my report for various parameters, till I told them that this was a typical report for a Captain with two years' service. Apparently, in the air force, officers with similar profiles would get 7s and 6s!
One day (I think Ramzan ended that day, 16 February 1997), we were on top of our bunker repairing it, when the first shells of our tenure started landing. This was around 4 pm and we quickly got into the bunker in combat mode - binoculars, compass, target list, field telephone and radio. The radio was a backup, all communication was via telephone. I started the procedure to engage the enemy post across the valley in front of us. We started engaging the enemy positions - orders were that I could fire ten shells if I saw enemy movement or was fired upon. While I was passing corrections on line, a shell exploded outside and the splinters entered our bunker through the door(the one that could not be repaired due to shortage of sandbags). One hit me in the head and ricocheted off the steel plates in the ceiling. I fell down and the line went dead.
I was nearing the end of my tenure there when I got a call from the base, saying I was being relieved in a couple of days as I had to go to Dehradun for my Pilots Aptitude test. I had applied for this before coming to Siachen and had forgotten about it. This was to become an army aviation pilot. My reliever landed up in the next two days and after a short handing over program, I started my journey back. Since I had three days to reach Dehradun, I and my party had to complete the three day trek back to base in two days, and then I had to take an air force transport plane to Chandigarh, and a bus to Dehradun to appear in the test.
Sunday, 3 May 2020
Sometimes, tough leadership is essential!
Signing a document in the quarter guard |
This one is about discipline and managing your team's expectations of a fair deal and establishing a good professional environment.
I go back to an incident when I was commanding my unit in Kashmir. Our advance party had moved to a peace location, and I got a report from them that a NCO on guard duty had assaulted the duty JCO(junior commissioned officer) who was checking the guard at night. This incident was about a year after a mutiny incident in an artillery regiment in Ladakh, and army chain of command was hyper sensitive to this aspect of disgruntled soldiers and poor leadership at that point.
This post is about managing various stakeholders and yet fulfilling duties as a leader.
Various stakeholders had different interests at this point in time. My immediate boss (who was heading the next higher formation, the brigade) did not want this incident to be highlighted as he was about to complete his command tenure. The local military administration wanted to highlight this incident as a 'mutiny' and show proactive intervention as a reflection of their initiative and leadership. They did not have jurisdiction over the matter, since I was not under their command. The JCO (and other JCOs) wanted action to be taken against the NCO. The NCO wanted to get out of it, so he as trying to project this incident as a scuffle (two way), not a case of insubordination. I, as commanding officer wanted to get to the bottom of the incident and make sure this didn't happen again. I wanted to convey a clear message to the unit of 600 soldiers by setting the right example. The army was sensitive to such incidents and chain of command would react based on information being reported. In most cases, formal reporting lags informal inputs, and people have already formed their opinions by the time actual reports go up the chain. In this case, most people who heard about it assumed that this was a case of mutiny.
I ordered a court of inquiry to find out what happened. The local formation also ordered a court of inquiry and wanted a copy of the proceedings to be submitted to them. However, I wrote back saying they did not have jurisdiction, and that a commanding officer is the sole authority to order a court of inquiry in a case of possible insubordination. They did not like it! All this while I was still 2000km away in an operational deployment. The formation commander of the division visited my advance party and called them a poor unit etc(we were not under his command, and this was before the court of inquiry had come out with its findings, so this was totally uncalled for), and this probably became a topic of discussion in army channels in that command. This implied pressure building up on the commanding officer - accused and probably pronounced guilty of poor leadership leading to a mutiny, etc.
In the meantime, we moved and reached the new location. The court of inquiry determined that this was a case of insubordination and assault against a superior, and not mutiny, since only one soldier was involved - a mutiny requires more than one co-accused. I conveyed my intent to hold a Summary Court Martial to try this NCO(a very nice article on SCM here). A commanding officer has the authority to award upto 1 year of rigorous imprisonment(RI) to the guilty NCO via SCM, based on a trial. By this time, the winds had changed and my boss wanted me to basically let the accused go with a slap on the wrist - apparently, now the concerns were that if this NCO was punished, other NCOs and soldiers could mutiny!! My concern as a commanding officer remained the same - to ensure that such cases of insubordination are not repeated in my unit, and a tough message needed to be sent. Perhaps I considered this since I knew of lenient handling of such cases in the past, due to which the unit was taking this lightly.
The NCO kept insisting that he did not assault the JCO, while all evidence pointed otherwise. I held the Summary Court Martial against the advice of my boss. It was established that he was guilty of assaulting a superior.
I could have sentenced him to a maximum of one year of rigorous imprisonment, which meant he would be dismissed from service and the sentence carried out in a central jail. Anything less than 90 days was to be carried out in the regiment quarter guard as per law. I decided to award him 89 days RI, since he did not have a past disciplinary record, and did not really deserve to be dismissed from service. It also provided maximum visibility of his punishment to others in the regiment - they saw this NCO going through the consequences of insubordination in front of them - RI involves being held in a cell, pack drill punishment every morning and evening etc, all while rest of the regiment was going about its daily routine right there. In contrast, a jail sentence would have taken this incident out of conversations among the soldiers very soon - out of sight, out of mind. Since he would not be paid his salary during this period, I asked the Subedar Major (Sergeant Major in other armies) to facilitate a collection from his battery so he could send money home.
As a leader, its important to do what is right for your team, and to reaffirm yourselves as a leader - even though some of them may not see it that way, and your hierarchy may have other interests. In this case, it was important to make sure that insubordination did not recur, and everyone in the unit understood it, although people outside were not keen to send this message across.
Sometimes, tough measures need to be taken, but leaders need to be compassionate while doing so, and set examples in balancing effectiveness with care for your team members. As long as these measures are seen to be fair, your team will accept them, no matter how tough they are!
Sunday, 19 April 2020
US Army greatcoat from the Korean war in the Indian Army
The story of this greatcoat, possibly from the Korean war goes like this:
During the 1962 conflict with China, India asked for military aid from the US to equip its mountain divisions. We did not have adequate equipment to fight the Chinese at that time.
A few excerpts from articles and documents on the events are given below.
"By November 1, US military supplies were arriving in India by air. At New Delhi’s behest, the first shipment was modest: military advisors, ammunition, rifles, mortars and airlift support. But by November 14 the two had established the “formal basis for military assistance” and Washington was preparing a $50 million package to equip five Indian divisions." from here.
"Both the United States and the Soviet Union stepped in to fill the breach in Indian defenses. Moscow supplied MiG-21 fighters and also built a number of factories in India to assemble advanced weapons.10 The U.S. equipped eight new infantry divisions for mountain defense against the Chinese and rebuilt some defense production facilities. The United States stopped the aid program during the 1965 India-Pakistan war, embittering Indian security managers who marked the United States as an unreliable military supplier." from here, and an interesting tidbit from the CIA archives here.
But the interesting part is this:
Americans probably had surplus clothing and equipment leftover from the Korean war of 1950 to '53, which they shipped to India.
I think that by the time this equipment could arrive, a ceasefire was declared by China. The US Army greatcoat reached an Ordnance depot in Kanpur, where it was dumped and forgotten for 40 years. It was never issued to any unit or formation because the next two wars were fought with Pakistan and probably, the need for this kind of winter clothing was never felt. After 1971, there never was a general mobilization till 2001, which was for Operation Parakram after the terrorist attack on Parliament. This was when the entire Indian Army was mobilized and I was attached to a light regiment in Northern Command, deployed on the Line of Control from School of Artillery, where I was an instructor.
A few days after reaching there, we got a mail from the ordnance depot in Kanpur(addressed generally to the whole army) that they had some surplus coats available on sale at Rs 440. This probably happened because the ordnance depot must have dusted their cobwebs while preparing for a possible war with Pakistan, and discovered these coats(and didn't know what to do with them)! Since I was at the regiment HQ that day and my CO asked me if I was interested, I said yes. When a colonel wants to get a coat, he sends a man to get it, and a captain who's hanging around gets collateral benefits! Since we sent a man, we received greatcoats that were not moth eaten.
This was the US Army greatcoat manufactured during the Korean war, with a wool inner lining. The only time I used it was 9 years later when I was commanding my unit near Srinagar in Kashmir.
COVID-19 Sunday activity led me back to this coat, now lying in a box, but still very much wearable after 70 years!
Sunday, 1 March 2020
Permanent commission and command for women officers: Implementation is key to success
Photo courtesy: BBC |
Should women be given a permanent commission in the army? Yes
Should they be given command of their units? Yes, if they qualify and meet the standards, like their male counterparts.
Great development for gender equality, but the devil is in the details.
Permanent commission and command consideration are complementary - if women are given a permanent commission, they should be automatically eligible for command of their units based on selection parameters, irrespective of gender. This has certain prerequisites that are paramount from recruitment onward. Command of units is a critical role in any army, and it would require the leader to be part of the team in all respects - right from the day he or she wears a uniform.
Recruit women officers based on vacancies, but also on the same parameters as men.
They must face the same standards of mental tests and physical fitness standards as men during selection. Recruitment of women as officers on compassionate grounds, even as an exception must stop. For example, bending a few rules of commissioning because they're soldiers' widows, or selection as an officer on a sympathy vote must stop. Would a man get a commission in the army with relaxed entry rules for age on compassionate grounds, even if he meets all other criteria? Maybe not!
Training standards for men and women cadets must be the same. And that begins with integrated training companies and platoons where they live, train, compete in sports and other activities together. All standards applicable to men should be equally applicable to women cadets - the same cross country, 5km run, PT, play football and basketball as teammates with their male counterparts. After all, at the end of it all, each one of them is a potential commanding officer who must lead men and women from the front. The current practice of separate training companies, different duration, different content and standards of training must go. In the beginning, some women may not meet the physical standards, but that expectation needs to be met by them(it should be standard for all who aspire to command), and they will, as time passes. Women must also train with everyone else to understand group dynamics, develop their leadership capabilities, and be able to assume leadership positions by natural selection or nomination during this training. This also helps bust myths about capabilities of women, and helps establish them as leaders among their peers during training.
Male officers have to establish themselves as leaders in their units right from day one. This starts from the first activity of the day - physical training, where young officers who push their men to attain tougher physical fitness standards establish positive influence over their teams. It is not so much about being physically stronger, but about letting your team know that whatever they do together, you are better than them - therefore you have the moral right to lead. This applies equally to physical fitness, technical and tactical knowledge and application, administration, and knowing and taking care of your team members.
An important aspect to also consider is building camaraderie, which comes to a great extent by sharing hardships together, whether sitting out enemy shelling in a bunker, or sharing tents and toilets with your men as young officers or even doing duty officer assignments without special treatment. People who disappear when the going gets tough are not remembered 'fondly'. That is why officers who have not spent much time in the field do not have a bond with their men or their peer officers, and probably do not get accepted as true leaders by their teams if they do become commanding officers. This aspect needs to be practiced by women without exception, if they are to be leaders and commanding officers. Of course the activities and experiences that build camaraderie would depend on the arm or service they belong to. For example, in Signals, it may be Signal Centre duties round the clock, or in Air Defence it may be deployment drills at the gun position. In fact, I still remember my course mate from Signals unhappily recounting that a newly commissioned lady officer in his unit was not being assigned signal centre duties in the night, because of which he was on night duty repeatedly. This was soon after women were inducted in 1994, I'm sure that things have changed by now, and women officers do not expect such soft treatment any more!
People quote numerous anecdotes of women officers participating in and leading difficult operations as examples of their fortitude. Most activities quoted as examples of the 'extraordinary' by women are routine functions that have been done by their male counterparts for ages, like leading convoys, building bridges and roads under difficult conditions, setting up communications etc. If women expect to be at par with men, then they must also realize that 'extraordinary' in military service would not be when compared to other women outside the forces, but as compared to any other officer(whether male or female).
Lets also start referring to them as officers, not 'lady officers'. Differentiating them as ladies is patently wrong. They are as much ladies as male officers are gentlemen, and need not be reminded of it every time they are addressed!
In any case, once they start getting considered for promotion to colonel and command of units, the promotion process itself would not distinguish between men and women based on their gender(I hope so). The selection process to colonel and brigadier in the Indian Army is confidential and anonymous (I have served in the department that promotes officers, and we went extraordinary lengths to make sure that the process is fair, and the officer is not identified in any way). Therefore, women officers should be considered against the same set of benchmarks used for others in the batch being promoted, with no special favours. Definitely no quotas for command. This is especially important if the quality of commanding officers is to be maintained and they are to be competent leaders. The Supreme Court has noted in its judgement that command is to be given based on criteria established by the armed forces - these should be the same as used for their male counterparts, again, without exception!
Currently, women serve in services (EME, Ordnance Army Service Corps, JAG, Education) and some supporting arms like Air Defence, Engineers, Signals etc as officers. Not as soldiers. Women could be considered for recruitment into the armed forces as soldiers in these 'departments' as well. If they have been found fit to lead as officers, it is because they can do all those things that the soldiers can, and better - an important factor that determines their acceptance as leaders in units. If women can do it as officers, why can't they do it as soldiers too, especially in roles that do not require combat service in contact with the enemy?
Thoughts and difference of opinion are welcome.
Colonel Abraham Cherian, Retd